3.10.2015
Might not be treason but it sure is bad for America
Let's get it out there
47 Senators intentionally broke U.S. Code by sending a letter to a foreign government of which we are currently engaged in negotiations regarding nuclear accessibility.
Why would they do this?
A deep hatred of an African-American President who was elected TWICE by the American public.
What can we do?
We can ask that the remaining 53 Senators put forth legislation to Censure these individuals so that they can have it on their record that they knowingly attempted to derail a sitting President's ability to negotiate with a foreign nation.
Twitter accounts of Unites States Senators
Social Media accounts for Senators
References
18 U.S. Code § 953 - Private correspondence with foreign governmentsAny citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/953
Logan Act - wiki summary
This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/953
Logan Act - wiki summary
Precedence for this may be found in the censure of Benjamin Tappan case relating to information provided to a newspaper during President Tyler's negotiations for the annexation of the Republic of Texas.
9.04.2014
5.29.2014
2013 Largest Donors to the NRA
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-03-14/the-nras-corporate-donors
5.28.2014
Gun "Rights?" No
Amendment II --- A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
______________________________
Pretty sure that the Founding Fathers in using the term "people" meant the "whole" of the residents of the "free State" and not the individual living amongst its borders.
To me, this means that the "free State" would issue "Arms" to the "people" in the event of an "attack" on the "free State" not an individual person.
Gun Manufacturers and their mouthpiece (NRA) spend millions of $$$ to put fear in the hearts of Americans so that they run out and buy every last firearm. They are the ones laughing all the way to the Bank.
Don't ban Guns, Ban Gun Manufacturers
#BANTHENRA
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/27/opinion/nocera-right-to-bear-arms-means-this.html?hp&rref=opinion&_r=0
______________________________
Pretty sure that the Founding Fathers in using the term "people" meant the "whole" of the residents of the "free State" and not the individual living amongst its borders.
To me, this means that the "free State" would issue "Arms" to the "people" in the event of an "attack" on the "free State" not an individual person.
Gun Manufacturers and their mouthpiece (NRA) spend millions of $$$ to put fear in the hearts of Americans so that they run out and buy every last firearm. They are the ones laughing all the way to the Bank.
Don't ban Guns, Ban Gun Manufacturers
#BANTHENRA
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/27/opinion/nocera-right-to-bear-arms-means-this.html?hp&rref=opinion&_r=0
4.17.2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)